The Islamabad Memorandum: Ceasefire Framework Signed Between the US and Iran
Context of the Islamabad Memorandum
In a landmark de-escalation following months of multi-front conflict in 2026, including direct US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets, Iranian retaliation, Strait of Hormuz disruptions, and intense fighting in Lebanon, the United States and Iran have formally signed the Islamabad Memorandum.
Mediated with support from Pakistan and featuring digital signatures from Presidents Donald Trump and Masoud Pezeshkian (with a ceremonial event in Switzerland), this 14-point Islamabad Memorandum entered into force immediately upon signing in mid-June 2026. It delivers an immediate ceasefire, begins restoring critical maritime traffic, and offers initial economic relief, while deferring the most contentious issues to a 60-day negotiating window aimed at producing a comprehensive final agreement to be endorsed by a UN Security Council resolution.
The Islamabad Memorandum arrives amid widespread war fatigue, soaring global energy prices, and complex domestic politics on both sides. Supporters view it as a pragmatic breakthrough, while critics, particularly in Israel and among US hardliners warn it grants Tehran too much too soon.
The Exact 14-Point Text of the Islamabad Memorandum
“Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran”
The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have jointly agreed in good faith on [ __ date] on the following:
- The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran and their allies in the current war are signing this MOU to declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon and other provisions of this paragraph.
- The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.
- The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran commit to negotiating and achieving the final deal in maximum 60 days, extendable with mutual consent.
- Immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.
- Upon the signing of this MOU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge, for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles, and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialog with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.
- The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalised as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required licenses, waivers and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America.
- The United States of America undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the United Nations Security Council resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed upon schedule as part of the final deal. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions termination issue above mentioned, and expressed their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.
- The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in paragraph seven, with the minimum methodology to be down blended on site under the supervision of the IAEA. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear needs, based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon in the final deal. The final deal will confirm the provisions of this paragraph. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran acknowledge the critical importance of the nuclear issues above mentioned. They express their intention to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them.
- Pending the final deal, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree to maintain the status quo. The Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region.
- The United States of America undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MOU and until the termination of sanctions, US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.
- The United States of America undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the implementation of this MOU. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during negotiations. Such funds, whether retained in the original account or transferred, shall be made fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America undertakes to issue all necessary licenses and authorisations accordingly.
- The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran agree that an executive mechanism will be established to monitor the successful implementation of this MOU and the future compliance of the final deal.
- 13 After signing this MOU, and subject to the beginning of the implementation of paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10 and 11 of this MOU, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal exclusively on the other paragraphs.
- The final deal will be endorsed by a binding UNSC resolution.
Critical Challenges: Hurdles for the Islamabad Memorandum to Become a Full Treaty
Despite its swift implementation on ceasefire and maritime access, the Islamabad Memorandum contains several structural weaknesses that could prevent evolution into a binding, long-term treaty:
Ambiguous Nuclear Provisions: Point 8 offers only a high-level reaffirmation against weaponisation and a minimal down-blending commitment. It leaves critical details regarding Iran’s near-weapons-grade stockpile approximately 500 kg of 60% enriched uranium, which is technically only a short step from weapons-grade, remain unaddressed. While Point 8 calls for the down-blending of stockpiled enriched material on site under IAEA supervision as a minimum step, it provides no specifics on quantities, current locations, timelines, or robust verification processes, deferring all of these to the final deal negotiations.
Conditional and Reversible Relief: Sanctions relief, asset releases, and the ambitious $300 billion reconstruction plan are all phased and contingent, creating ample room for disputes and potential snapbacks.
Regional Flashpoints: The Lebanon-specific language in Point 1 may conflict with Israel’s security needs and Iran’s longstanding ties to proxy groups, placing enforcement largely outside bilateral control.
Weak Enforcement Architecture: The monitoring mechanism in Point 12 lacks strong dispute-resolution tools, and the tight 60-day timeline remains vulnerable to political shifts in Washington or Tehran.
Funding Realism: Delivering the promised reconstruction funds will require sustained regional and private-sector buy-in that current investor confidence may not support.
These gaps position the Islamabad Memorandum more as a tactical pause than a strategic foundation.
Key Differences from Previous JCPOA Frameworks
The Islamabad Memorandum departs significantly from the 2015 JCPOA. While the JCPOA was a detailed, multilateral nuclear agreement with specific enrichment caps, stockpile limits, sunset clauses, and robust IAEA monitoring in return for sanctions relief, the current Islamabad Memorandum is strictly bilateral, provisional, and ceasefire-first. It priorities immediate de-escalation, naval blockade removal, oil waivers, and Hormuz access over comprehensive arms control, deferring the hardest issues. This deal-in-stages approach reflects post-war pragmatism but carries familiar risks of partial compliance and eventual breakdown seen in earlier frameworks.
Outlook for the Islamabad Memorandum
Whether the Islamabad Memorandum serves as a genuine bridge to stability or merely a temporary reset will depend on the political will demonstrated in the coming 60 days. Success hinges on verifiable compliance, effective mediation, and the ability of both sides to overcome deep-seated mistrust. Failure could rapidly return the region to confrontation, with even higher stakes. For now, the world watches as this fragile framework attempts to turn battlefield exhaustion into diplomatic opportunity.
Also Read:
US-Iran Peace Agreement: A Fragile Pause in a High-Stakes Confrontation
Beyond the Switzerland MoU: A Forensic Analysis of US-Iran MoU Structural Risks
